What your best candidates will never tell tou (But you absolutely need to know)

Nicolas Grancher • 20 mai 2025

“Thank you for your time.” “Everything went well.” “I’m very interested.”

At first glance, everything sounds perfect. And yet, behind these polite expressions often hides a very different reality — one of doubt, hesitation… or even a candidate who has already decided not to join your company.

In the world of pharmaceutical recruitment, where the talent war is intense and every hire is strategic, what your top candidates don’t say can make all the difference.
Ignoring these unspoken signals means risking the loss of rare profiles, damaging your employer brand, and compromising your growth objectives.


Why this topic matters for pharmaceutical recruiters today


The pharmaceutical sector is undergoing major transformation: technological innovation, stricter regulatory requirements, a growing need for organizational agility... In this context, companies are looking for highly specialized talent capable of evolving in complex, demanding environments.


But these talents — precisely because they are so sought after — have options. More than ever, they are evaluating the company as much as the company is evaluating them.
They're not just looking for a good salary or a prestigious job title: they want meaning, recognition, and deep alignment with their values.


As a result, many candidates adopt a cautious stance during interviews. Rather than risk being seen as difficult, they hide their doubts behind professional smiles.

For a recruiter, the ability to detect and interpret these invisible signals has become a strategic skill.


The silent truths: what candidates don’t dare to say


Even the most confident candidates often hesitate to share their real impressions during an interview.


Why? Because they know the power dynamic rarely works in their favor. They want to remain “marketable” and avoid coming across as demanding or picky.


Here’s what they may be thinking — but will likely never say out loud:


“I’m not convinced the role is clearly defined.”
When responsibilities are vaguely presented or the project feels unstable, uncertainty sets in. But few candidates will express this discomfort for fear of being judged.


“Your company culture doesn’t feel like a fit.”
A rigid atmosphere, authoritarian management, or a lack of diversity… Candidates sense these things early on but stay politically correct to avoid conflict.


“This process is too long — I feel undervalued.”
Weeks between steps, or no feedback at all, make them feel interchangeable. They’ll stay polite — but mentally, they’ve already left.


“I’m struggling to trust you.”
When your message sounds too polished or when key questions go unanswered, doubts creep in. Top candidates know they need a reliable employer — but few will voice this discomfort.


In summary, many critical factors for a candidate are never verbalized during the interview — yet they strongly influence their final decision.


Words vs. Reality: the disconnect during interviews


One of the biggest traps for recruiters is relying solely on what is said during interviews.
Polite smiles, nods of agreement, or quick but shallow answers are often red flags.

A candidate’s true feelings are often revealed in their body language, tone, and emotional distance.


For example:

  • A candidate who keeps saying “everything is great” but asks no questions about the team, culture, or growth opportunities may only have a superficial interest.
  • A candidate who politely thanks you but avoids eye contact when discussing the role’s real challenges is likely harboring serious doubts.


Learning to notice these subtle cues means you can anticipate the final decision — before it slips through your fingers.


The hidden cost of ignoring the unspoken


What happens if you miss these silent signals?

The consequences can be serious — and while they may not be immediate, they are very real:


  1. The ghost candidates
    Everything seemed to go well… until they vanished without explanation.
    No reply after the interview, no response to your offer.
    They left with unresolved doubts — and no one made the effort to address them.
  2. A damaged employer brand
    In pharma, professional networks are tight and informal.
    A dissatisfied (even silent) candidate can easily share their experience with peers.
    Over time, your reputation suffers — making future recruitment slower and harder.
  3. A loss of competitiveness
    When your competitors are better at reading candidates' unspoken expectations, they naturally attract the best profiles — while you’re left wondering why your process is no longer effective.


What you can do to better detect the unspoken


You don’t need to become a psychologist to avoid these pitfalls.


A few simple but powerful practices can help create an environment where candidates feel safe enough to share their real perspective.


1. Introduce “reverse interviews”


Don’t just evaluate the candidate.
Give them a genuine space to evaluate you — to ask their questions, express their hesitations.


Practical tips:

  • Set aside time (e.g., the last 15 minutes) where the candidate is explicitly invited to ask anything.
  • Encourage honesty. Say directly that critical questions are welcome.
  • Use open-ended questions such as:
  • “What’s unclear to you about this role?”
  • “Is there anything you’d like to better understand before moving forward?”
  • “What would make you hesitate to accept this job?”


This signals that you value their input and want a transparent, mutual fit.


2. Create a psychologically safe environment


Your posture as a recruiter makes all the difference.

To encourage authenticity:

  • Practice active listening: Show through your body language and tone that you’re present, open, and non-judgmental.
  • Embrace vulnerability: Don’t hide the role’s challenges or team dynamics. By being honest, you give them permission to be honest too.
  • Normalize doubt: Explicitly say that questions and concerns are welcome.
    For example:
    “It’s perfectly normal to have questions about a new project. I’d really like you to feel comfortable expressing them.”


This kind of environment often unlocks precious insights — helping you adapt your approach or flag early signs of disengagement.


Conclusion: listening beyond words to recruit better


In the demanding world of pharmaceutical recruitment, what you see is no longer enough.
You must learn to listen to what isn’t said.

The best candidates — those who will truly make a difference for your company — won’t reveal everything in the first interview.
They’re waiting for a clear signal from you:

That you’re willing to listen.
That you’re willing to understand.
And that you’re willing to build a relationship rooted in authenticity and trust.

By tuning in to these silent truths and narrowing the gap between words and emotion, you’ll shift from being just a “recruiter” to becoming a true partner in their career journey.


par Nicolas Grancher 30 janvier 2026
An interview in the pharmaceutical industry rarely leaves candidates indifferent. Even experienced professionals, accustomed to demanding environments, often walk away with a mix of relief, doubt, and unanswered questions. “Was I clear enough?” “Did I say what I was supposed to say?” “Was it too formal? Not formal enough?” “Did we have the right feeling?” These questions are universal. Yet, they are rarely voiced. In a sector as rigorous as the pharmaceutical industry, emotions tend to have little space in the official discourse, even though they are omnipresent in candidates’ real experiences. This article aims to put words to what candidates truly go through during an interview, in order to better understand it, reduce unnecessary anxiety… and regain a sense of control over the experience. Immediate tension: being assessed without losing credibility From the very first minutes, many candidates experience a familiar sensation: the tension of being evaluated. Interviews are often structured, highly framed, and sometimes very technical. The setting is established quickly: competencies, responsibilities, compliance, processes. This framework can create a paradoxical feeling: - on one hand, it is reassuring (you know what to expect), - on the other, it is pressurising (you feel observed and analysed). Many candidates experience: - fear of giving an approximate answer, - concern about not being “at the expected level,” - the feeling that every word matters. This tension is normal. It does not indicate a lack of competence or poor preparation. It reflects an environment where mistakes carry a high cost. The weight of formality: between respect and distance Another frequent feeling is formality. In the pharmaceutical sector, interviews are often: - highly structured, - minimally improvised, - conducted by several interviewers. For some candidates, this framework feels safe. For others, it creates a sense of relational distance. Many candidates internally ask themselves: - “Can I be myself?” - “Should I stay strictly factual?” - “Is it appropriate to show my motivation?” This internal questioning can lead to significant mental fatigue. Candidates constantly juggle between who they are and who they believe they should appear to be. The strange feeling of constantly having to “prove” oneself Even for experienced profiles, interviews often revive a familiar sensation: the need to justify oneself. To justify: - career choices, - transitions, - periods of doubt, - technical limitations. Some candidates feel a sense of unfairness: “My career path is coherent why do I still have to defend it?” This feeling is particularly strong in a sector that values stability, compliance, and linear progression. Atypical career paths, although increasingly common, often require more explanation. Post-interview doubt: a universal experience Once the interview is over, another phase begins: the internal debrief. In the hours or days that follow, many candidates replay the conversation mentally: - a response they could have phrased differently, - a question they misunderstood, - a moment of hesitation. This doubt is amplified by two factors common in the pharmaceutical sector: - long response times, - limited or no detailed feedback. When information is missing, interpretation takes over. And interpretation fuels self-criticism. The “feeling”: a source of hope… and anxiety The feeling plays an ambiguous role in the candidate experience. When the exchange is smooth, human, and respectful, candidates often leave feeling hopeful. When it is colder or very formal, anxiety sets in. What many candidates don’t realise is that: - a very formal interview is not necessarily a negative signal, - a good interaction does not guarantee a positive decision. From the recruiter’s perspective, “feeling” does not always mean immediate alignment. It may simply reflect a highly standardised professional framework. The fear of not having been “enough” - Clear enough. - Precise enough. - Technical enough. - Convincing enough. This fear is particularly strong among candidates who: - compare themselves to others, - are aware of market tension, - know that similar profiles are competing for the role. It can create a lingering impression of never doing enough, even when the background is solid. What candidates rarely realise… but is very real  One important point deserves to be stated clearly: there is uncertainty on the recruiter’s side as well. Recruiters and hiring managers in the pharmaceutical sector: doubt - compare, - hesitate, - arbitrate. Silence or hesitation is not always linked to a negative impression. More often, it reflects the complexity of the decision-making process. How to better navigate the interview experience While not all parameters are within a candidate’s control, some levers can help: Accept discomfort Discomfort is part of the process. Resisting it only increases tension. Focus on clarity rather than performance Being understandable is more valuable than being impressive. Remember that an interview is a two-way meeting You are also assessing the environment, the team, and the culture. Avoid overinterpreting immediately afterward Let emotions settle before drawing conclusions. Regaining agency as a candidate Putting words to what you feel helps reduce confusion. Realising that these emotions are widely shared makes it easier to put things into perspective. An interview is not a verdict on your professional worth. It is one step, in a specific context, at a specific moment in time.
par Nicolas Grancher 30 janvier 2026
Un entretien dans l’industrie pharmaceutique laisse rarement indifférent. Même les profils expérimentés, habitués aux environnements exigeants, en ressortent souvent avec un mélange de soulagement, de doute et d’interrogations. « Est-ce que j’ai été assez clair·e ? » « Est-ce que j’ai dit ce qu’il fallait ? » « Est-ce que c’était trop formel ? Pas assez ? » « Est-ce que j’ai eu le bon feeling ? » Ces questions sont universelles. Pourtant, elles sont rarement exprimées. Parce que dans un secteur aussi rigoureux que le pharmaceutique, les émotions ont peu de place dans le discours officiel , alors qu’elles sont omniprésentes dans l’expérience réelle des candidats. Cet article propose de mettre des mots sur ce que vivent vraiment les candidats lors d’un entretien, afin de mieux comprendre, de dédramatiser… et de reprendre un peu de maîtrise sur l’expérience. Une tension immédiate : être évalué sans perdre sa crédibilité Dès les premières minutes, une sensation s’installe chez beaucoup de candidats : la tension de l’évaluation . Les entretiens sont souvent structurés, cadrés, parfois très techniques. Le décor est posé rapidement : on parle compétences, responsabilités, conformité, processus. Ce cadre peut générer un sentiment paradoxal : d’un côté, il rassure (on sait à quoi s’attendre), de l’autre, il met sous pression (on se sent observé, analysé). Beaucoup de candidats ressentent alors : la peur de dire une approximation, la crainte de ne pas être “au niveau attendu”, l’impression que chaque mot compte. Cette tension est normale. Elle ne signifie ni un manque de compétence, ni un défaut de préparation. Elle est le reflet d’un environnement où l’erreur a un coût élevé . Le poids du formalisme : entre respect et distance Un autre ressenti fréquent est celui du formalisme . Dans le secteur pharmaceutique, les entretiens sont souvent : très structurés, peu improvisés, menés par plusieurs interlocuteurs. Pour certains candidats, ce cadre est sécurisant. Pour d’autres, il crée une forme de distance relationnelle. Beaucoup se demandent alors : « Est-ce que je peux être moi-même ? » « Est-ce que je dois rester très factuel·le ? » « Est-ce que montrer mes motivations est approprié ? » Ce questionnement interne peut générer une fatigue mentale importante. Le candidat jongle en permanence entre ce qu’il est et ce qu’il pense devoir montrer . Le sentiment étrange de devoir “prouver” en permanence Même pour des profils expérimentés, l’entretien ravive souvent une sensation bien connue : devoir se justifier . Justifier : ses choix de carrière, ses transitions, ses périodes de doute, ses limites techniques. Certains candidats ressentent une forme d’injustice : « Mon parcours est cohérent, pourquoi dois-je encore le défendre ? » Ce sentiment est d’autant plus fort que ce secteur valorise la stabilité, la conformité et la progression linéaire. Les parcours atypiques, bien que de plus en plus fréquents, demandent souvent plus d’explications. Le doute après l’entretien : un classique universel Une fois l’entretien terminé, une autre phase commence : le débrief intérieur . Dans les heures ou les jours qui suivent, beaucoup de candidats repassent mentalement l’échange : une réponse qu’ils auraient pu formuler autrement, une question mal comprise, un moment de flottement. Ce doute est amplifié par deux éléments fréquents dans notre secteur: des délais de réponse longs, peu de feedback détaillé. L’absence d’information laisse place à l’interprétation. Et l’interprétation nourrit l’auto-critique. Le feeling : une source d’espoir… et d’inquiétude Le feeling occupe une place ambiguë dans le ressenti candidat. Quand l’échange est fluide, humain, respectueux, beaucoup repartent avec de l’espoir. Quand il est plus froid ou très formel, l’inquiétude s’installe. Mais ce que beaucoup ignorent, c’est que : un entretien très formel n’est pas forcément un mauvais signal, un bon échange ne garantit pas une décision positive. Le feeling, côté recruteur, ne signifie pas toujours adhésion immédiate. Il peut simplement refléter un cadre professionnel très normé . La peur de ne pas avoir été “assez” Assez clair·e. Assez précis·e. Assez technique. Assez convaincant·e. Cette peur est particulièrement forte chez les candidats qui : se comparent beaucoup, connaissent la tension du marché, savent que d’autres profils similaires sont en lice. Elle peut générer une impression diffuse de ne jamais en faire assez , même lorsque le parcours est solide. Ce que les candidats ressentent rarement… mais qui est pourtant réel Un point important à rappeler : côté recruteur aussi, il y a de l’incertitude. Les recruteurs et managers du secteur pharmaceutique : doutent comparent, hésitent arbitrent. Le silence ou l’hésitation ne sont pas toujours liés à une mauvaise impression. Ils sont souvent liés à la complexité de la décision. Comment mieux vivre l’expérience d’entretien Sans pouvoir contrôler tous les paramètres, les candidats peuvent agir sur certains leviers : 1. Accepter la part d’inconfort L’inconfort fait partie de l’exercice. Le refuser augmente la tension. 2. Se concentrer sur la clarté plutôt que la performance Être compréhensible vaut mieux qu’être impressionnant. 3. Se rappeler que l’entretien est une rencontre Vous évaluez aussi l’environnement, l’équipe, la culture. 4. Ne pas surinterpréter à chaud Laissez retomber l’émotion avant de tirer des conclusions. Reprendre du pouvoir côté candidat Mettre des mots sur ce que l’on ressent permet de sortir de la confusion. Comprendre que ces émotions sont partagées par beaucoup aide à relativiser. L’entretien n’est pas un verdict sur votre valeur. C’est une étape, dans un contexte donné, à un moment donné.